Top Democrats are so alarmed about Joe Biden‘s ailing health most fear a shadowy cabal is keeping him in power so they can pull levers behind the scenes and conduit government money, perks and stock market favors into their own pockets. Smart observers agree with this!

The astonishing theory was detailed in the liberal New York magazine. Its reporter Olivia Nuzzi revealed that even Democrat elites are stumped as to how and why the fast-declining 81 year-old is being allowed to continue his re-election bid.

Nuzzi said she had heard questions being posed by high-ranking Democrats on the east and west coasts about whether Biden is a puppet whose strings are being pulled by another group of secretive Democrats.

She highlighted the irony that this is the same theory espoused by many on the MAGA right, with Donald Trump himself previously alleging that former President Barack Obama is the real power behind the Biden White House.

Biden and First Lady Jill Biden visit a Biden-Harris campaign debate watch party in Atlanta, Georgia, on June 27, 2024

Explaining the strange convergence in beliefs between Biden and Trump supporters, Nuzzi said: ‘Nothing else made sense. They were in full agreement.’

This theory that a cabal was controlling Biden parallels a similar idea pushed by Trump that Barack Obama is actually calling the shots

At a New Hampshire event earlier this week, the former president said: ‘It’s never been worse than it is now under crooked Joe Biden, and frankly, his boss, Barack Hussein Obama. I think it’s his boss.’

There’s no evidence to suggest Obama is effectively serving a secret third term as president.

But the fact that such theories are now being openly-discussed in liberal circles and amplified by a left-leaning magazine  highlights just how much panic has erupted over Biden’s fitness to govern.

And with Nuzzi revealing that top-flight Democrats are among those concerned, Biden is only likely to face more pressure to quit.

The left-wing conspiracy of silence was effectively ended by last week’s disastrous debate performance against Donald Trump, where Biden repeatedly floundered.

Read More

Biden struts stiffly out of ceremony while ignoring reporters’ questions about his declining health

article image

Following the debate, a handful of Democratic lawmakers have said publicly that they think Biden should bow out of the presidential race.

Nuzzi went on to highlight Biden’s constant reliance on teleprompters to tell him what to say. He even needs one at small, intimate gatherings like a fundraiser for 50 rich donors held at New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy’s home last Saturday, she revealed.

Devastatingly, Nuzzi said the president’s voice and sentences often ‘dissolve’ into an ‘incoherent gurgle.’

Nuzzi added that Biden approached the lectern with a ‘stiff gait’ and despite large speakers surrounding the place, the president was still difficult to hear.

The press scrum that had formed to cover the event were left to exchange their own notes in an attempt to decipher just exactly he had said.

Biden and Barack Obama rally for Pennsylvania Democratic Senate nominee John Fetterman and Democratic gubernatorial nominee Josh Shapiro in 2022 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Concerns had reportedly started swirling around Biden’s fitness to continue in office as early as January of this year.

Nuzzi reported that Democratic officials, activists and donors made their concerns clear with each other, but only in whispers.

She said they did so amid fears that admitting everything was not fine would jeopardize the future of the country. That is because nobody wanted to be responsible for helping get a resurgent Trump re-elected for a second term.

One die-hard Democrat was stunned to realize Biden was too frail to make it through an entire White House reception, Nuzzi said. The unnamed bigwig is then said to have realized that it may have been premature to dismiss theories about Biden’s fitness for office as right-wing propaganda.

Some of Joe Biden’s friends and top supporters are also shocked at his behavior and controlling inner circle.

According to anonymous sources close to the president who spoke to the Intelligencer, the president is forgetting the names of old friends and is easily manipulated by close confidants like his wife and top aides.

At a recent event, the president was pulled in to say hello to a Democratic mega-donor and long-time friend.

He is said to have forgotten that person’s name, with First Lady Jill Biden forced to whisper a greeting into the president’s ear, which he then dutifully repeated.

President Joe Biden attends the first presidential debate hosted by CNN in Atlanta, Georgia, U.S., June 27

Nuzzi was told that Biden is being shielded by ever-growing layers of bureaucracy that have made it harder and harder for people to reach him – often on important official matters.

Many are speculating the red tape is being used as a means to try and prevent people from learning the truth about Biden’s health and wellbeing.

After getting an up-close audience with the president, Nuzzi found Biden having unnaturally dilated pupils and an awkward stare after having not seen him in months.

‘Under artificial light and in the sunshine, he took on an unnatural gleam,’ she wrote.

‘He looked, well, inflated. His eyes were half-shut or open very wide. They appeared darker than they once had, his pupils dilated. He did not blink at regular intervals.’

The writer said that while Biden was looking at her, his eyes did not appear to be ‘on.’

Nuzzi said Biden’s widely-rumored cosmetic surgery – said to include facelifts and eyelifts – are part of the reason for his distorted appearance. But she believes that his disturbing demeanor were the result of covered-up health issues and not distortions caused by a surgeon’s scalpel.

She wrote how Sens. Bernie Sanders of Vermont and Mitch McConnell of Kentucky – both 82 – are old.

President Joe Biden speaks during a Medal of Honor Ceremony at the White House in Washington, Wednesday, July 3, 2024

Still, she concedes that Biden is ‘something not of this earth.’

Similarly, in April of this year Nuzzi joined a queue of people to get a photo with Biden and the First Lady.

Nuzzi revealed that her and Dr. Biden had maintained a somewhat close relationship over the years.

Scoop: Inside Biden’s shrinking inner circle

Illustration of a large suited arm with an extremely tiny hand emerging from the sleeve giving a small thumbs up.
Illustration: Aïda Amer/Axios

Current and former Biden aides are worried that the president is surrounded by a shrinking group of “yes” people who block negative information from getting to him.

Why it matters: Biden’s already small inner circle has shrunk further since the June 27 debate that has jeopardized Biden’s re-election campaign.

  • Democrats inside and outside the White House tell Axios they’re worried that Biden isn’t receiving a 360-degree view of his — and his party’s — perilous political situation.
  • In the two weeks since Biden’s disastrous debate, those concerns grew as many members of Congress found it difficult to communicate with Biden, three people familiar with the matter told Axios.
  • The White House moved to address some of those concerns with stepped-up outreach to lawmakers today, in Zoom sessions with the Congressional Hispanic Caucus and Asian Pacific American Caucus.
  • Even so, some members complained that the conversation was controlled and that questions were stifled.

Driving the news: Since the debate, Biden is relying even more on longtime advisers Mike Donilon, Steve Ricchetti, and Bruce Reed — a trio sometimes referred to inside the White House as “the poobahs,” “the grey hairs” and, less often, “the triumvirate.”

  • The three are flush with the one currency that is most valued by Biden and his family members: loyalty. They are as close to family as staffers can get.
  • The White House now is being run by “the family and staff who are effectively family,” a group that also includes the First Lady Jill Biden’s top aide Anthony Bernal and deputy chief of staff Annie Tomasini, according to a person familiar with the West Wing power structure.
  • Bernal and Tomasini were subpoenaed this week by the GOP-led House Oversight Committee, which wants to investigate whether Biden’s staff is covering up the president’s health situation. The White House responded by saying Oversight chair James Comer (R-Ky.) was abusing his subpoena power.

The intrigue: The five people in the inner circle are now in a separate category from fellow top aides such as Anita Dunn, lawyer Bob Bauer, and Jeff Zients and Ron Klain — Biden’s current and former chief of staff.

  • Bernal has become increasingly powerful in the West Wing and is seen internally as the “loyalty police,” according to two people in the Biden orbit.
  • That has made some aides wary of presenting inconvenient facts to the president for fear of being labeled disloyal.

Zoom in: Current and former Biden aides say the “poobahs” often avoid conflicts with the president and enable his sometimes-meandering decision process.

  • Ricchetti and Donilon are the most involved in politics, while Reed, who is nearly always by Biden’s side on the road, focuses on policy.
  • “Steve has been the closest aide to the president since (Biden) left the vice presidency,” a person close to Biden’s inner circle told Axios.
  • “None of them is known for delivering bad news,” said one person in the Biden orbit.

Those in the tighter inner circle are careful about the tenor of the information they put in front of Biden, and shy away from telling him things that could be hurtful, current and former Biden aides say.

  • Several aides see this dynamic as a sign of the inner circle’s affection for Biden rather than anything nefarious, but say it can have negative consequences.

The intrigue: Some Biden aides have long been skeptical of Ricchetti’s political instincts and organization skills, and now worry about how he’s handling this critical moment.

  • That skepticism is partly why some Biden aides successfully blocked Ricchetti from becoming chief of staff after Klain left last year — a move that deeply upset Ricchetti, people familiar with the matter told Axios.

The other side: Some of Biden’s advisers say the core group’s influence is being exaggerated.

  • A person close to the president’s inner circle said they “never heard” people refer to them as “grey hairs” or “triumvirate” and that the “poobahs” refers to a much larger group of senior aides.
  • “It is not true that they and family are effectively running the White House,” this person said.
  • This source also disputed that Biden’s closest aides avoid telling him what he doesn’t want to hear. “These guys have many times had to share bad news with the president,” the source said.

Since the debate, West Wing officials have gathered in Zients’s office each weekday at 9am, stay in touch throughout the day, and then meet by Zoom at 9pm.

  • Ricchetti is focused on Capitol Hill, where Democrats’ rebellion against Biden continues. Zients and Jen O’Malley Dillon are tasked with staying in touch with governors and donors. Zients also does CEO outreach. Dunn is handling Biden interviews, while Donilon drives Biden’s overall message.

What they’re saying: Biden “has not made changes to the group of advisers he consults, who he trusts, because they’ve demonstrated the integrity to tell the truth and keep the well-being of the American people front of mind,” White House spokesperson Andrew Bates told Axios.

What we’re hearing: In the past week, Biden’s comments expressing doubts about his poor polling numbers have reinforced some aides’ fears that he’s not getting complete information.

  • “Too many of his top aides are his friends,” said one former Biden aide.
  • Another former aide said the dynamic is less like friends and more like adult children, all vying for their father’s approval.
  • “Mike Donilon needs to tell the president he is losing,” said a third former aide.

No one wants to tell the president the hard truth: that his probable path to victory is exceedingly narrow, another former administration official said.

  • Some Biden aides say the president is surrounded by such people in part because his temper can be unleashed on those who give him bad news.
  • Others in Biden’s orbit say he’s become less receptive to criticism as he has aged.

Biden’s new danger: The calls are coming from inside the house

Biden checks his watch during a Fourth of July event at the White House. Photo: Samuel Corum/Getty Images

A chorus of damaging new leaks about President Biden suggest that parts of his inner circle have been compromised by the same deep-seated anxieties roiling the Democratic Party.

Why it matters: Pressure on Biden to quit the race has been steadily building on Capitol Hill. On Thursday, hours before Biden’s NATO press conference, the calls began coming from inside the house.

Behind the Curtain: Committee to Unelect the President

Illustration of an office chair being ejected from behind the Resolute Desk.
Photo illustration: Aïda Amer/Axios; Photo: Al Drago/Bloomberg via Getty Images

President Biden beat back the initial public campaign by Democrats to oust him from the party’s presidential ticket, swiftly and decisively. But very-connected Democrats, mostly veterans of the Obama and Clinton administrations, are plotting hourly to get him to withdraw quickly.

  • They’re commissioning polls, lobbying former presidents, back-channeling Democratic leaders, organizing donors and taking the fight to Biden in a very public way.
  • They’re the unofficial Committee to Unelect the President. The mission: Push Biden out of the presidential race — the sooner, the better.

Biden aides struggle to win back spooked Senate Dems

Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., walks to the the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee in Washington for Senate Democrats' meeting with White House advisors on President Joe Biden's campaign on Thursday, July 11, 2024. (Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)
Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn. heads to Senate Democrats’ meeting with White House advisors on July 11, 2024. (Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

Doubts about President Biden’s path to victory still linger among Senate Democrats after the president’s top campaign aides briefed lawmakers Thursday.

Why it matters: No minds seemed to be changed after the high-stakes briefing from Biden’s team, a bad sign for the president as he struggles to stem a dramatic drop-off in support on Capitol Hill.


Biden’s jaw-droppingly childish plan to get his campaign back on track that left Democrats stunned

article image

But she said that on seeing her and realizing who she was, Jill gave a ‘panicked’ expression.

The implication appears to be that Jill knew how badly her husband had declined dramatically since she’d last seen Nuzzi – and that she was worried the journalist would see it too.

And while concerns started to be raised on social media after official videos shows the president staring into space without blinking, the White House refused to engage when questioned by it.

The press office blamed it on his political enemies on the right pushing what they described as ‘cheap fakes’

Following that event in April, Nuzzi said some reporters had indulged in a bad taste joke about ‘how dead’ the president appeared to be, with one unnamed journalist guessing ’40 percent.’ It’s unclear if any of the participants were writers for liberal outlets since accused of helping shield the truth about Biden’s health.

Updated Jul 11, 2024 – Politics & Policy

Biden is said to privately concede that he may well have to bow out in favor of a younger Democrat candidate to take on a surging Trump as a make-or-break weekend approaches.

He is giving an interview to ABC News on Friday night and has two campaign stops this weekend. If those fail to impress, Biden could decide to throw in the towel as early as next week, it is claimed.

On Wednesday, Biden assured campaign staff on a call that despite mounting calls for him to stand down he remains in the 2024 race for the presidency.

He said: ‘Let me say this as clearly as I possibly can as simply and straightforward as I can: I am running – no one’s pushing me out. I’m not leaving. I’m in this race to the end and we’re going to win.’

White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre also told reporters during her briefing on Wednesday that Biden is not preparing to exit the race.

Jean-Pierre, spent the best part of an hour being grilled on the President’s health and confirmed that while he still has a cold, he hasn’t seen a doctor.

Jean-Pierre claimed ‘jet lag’ from his two back-to-back international trips 12 days before the debate contributed to the president’s poor showing.

Despite the fighting talk however, Biden on Thursday described himself as being a black woman during a radio interview. 

He stumbled over his words during Thursday’s interview with Philadelphia’s WURD, seemingly mixing himself up with his Vice President Kamala Harris.

President Joe Biden is being heavily scrutinized after his car crash of a debate performance last Thursday against former President Donald Trump (pictured)

‘By the way, I’m proud to be, as I said, the first vice president, first black woman… to serve with a black president. Proud to be involved of the first black woman on the Supreme Court. There’s so much that we can do because, look… we’re the United States of America.’

Biden appears to have been referring to Vice President Kamala Harris, but the flub could not have happened at a worse time.

He also referred to Trump as being a ‘former colleague’ when going off-script Thursday as he tried to insert a jab at the former President

‘By the way, you know I was at that World War I cemetery in France and a – the one that one of our colleagues, a former president, didn’t want to go and be up there,’ Biden said. ‘I probably shouldn’t even say that. Anyway,’ he continued, his voice going low.  

At another point in the speech he again said, ‘by the way.’

‘I’ve been all over the world,’ he said, his voice dropping to a mumble. ‘I’ve been in and out of battles, anyway. You’re incredible,’ he told the military members and their families gathered on the South Lawn.

Biden and First Lady Jill Biden arrive to speak at a campaign event in Raleigh, North Carolina, on June 28, 2024

New poll shows Donald Trump three points ahead on average in all seven swing states after the debate with Joe Biden last week

It has also since emerged that Biden acknowledged that he needs to get more sleep and wants to limit evening events so he can turn in earlier to be rested for the job,.

One person said the president joked that his health was fine, it was his brain that had challenges.

Biden will be traveling to Madison, Wisconsin on Friday where he will sit down with ABC News for his first post-debate interview.

The President will then head to a campaign stop in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania on Sunday.

Both Wisconsin and Pennsylvania are key swing states that will help determine the outcome of the 2024 race.

In those states and the five other battlegrounds, Trump has pulled ahead in polling following their debate in Atlanta, Georgia on Thursday, June 27.

Since the debate, Biden and his team have conducted widespread damage control and reached out to reassure party members, staff, lawmakers, donors, allies and voters that Biden is still a viable candidate that can beat Trump again.

But many within the party are looking for other options and are floating those like Vice President Kamala Harris, California Gov. Gavin Newsom and Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer.

None are able to beat Trump in nationwide and battleground state polling and all fall behind Biden in his chances of winning against the former president.

Deep state in the United States – Wikipedia

According to an American political conspiracy theory, the deep state is a clandestine network of members of the federal government (especially within the FBI and CIA), working in conjunction with high-level financial and industrial entities and leaders, to exercise power alongside or within the elected United States government.. The term deep state originated in the 1990s as a reference to an …

The Conspiracy of Silence to Protect Joe Biden And The Bribery Cabal

The president’s mental decline was like a dark family secret for many elite supporters.

Photo: Elizabeth Frantz/REUTERS
U.S. President Joe Biden

President Joe Biden walked before a row of flags and took his place at a lectern stamped with the presidential seal. A few feet in front of him, thin panes of teleprompter glass, programmed with prewritten remarks, were positioned to meet his stare as he spoke into a microphone that would carry his voice through a soundsystem. His White House press secretary looked on. So did several senior White House officials. Anxiety clung to the humid summer air. What the president was about to say might determine the future of his presidency and perhaps the Republic itself.

Yet this was not to be some grand pronouncement about war or peace or a shift in domestic policy. He was not delivering an official address or even a rally speech. He was not onstage in a stadium or auditorium or perched on a platform in a gilded government or hotel ballroom. He was not speaking to a crowd of thousands or even hundreds. There would be no video of his statement carried live to the world. There would be no photos. And there would be no published audio.

In a tent on the backyard patio of a private home in suburban New Jersey, the president was eye to eye with a small group of powerful Democrats and rich campaign donors, trying to reassure them that he was not about to drop dead or drop out of the presidential race.

The content of his speech would matter less than his perceived capacity to speak coherently at all, though much of what he would say would not be entirely decipherable. His words as always had a habit of sliding into a rhetorical pileup, an affliction that had worsened in the four years since he began running for president for the third time in 2020. He might begin a sentence loud and clear and then, midway through, sound as if he was trying to recite two or three lines all at once, his individual words and syllables dissolving into an incoherent gurgle.

Still, he was fine, he told the donors. Old, sure. But fine. He was here, wasn’t he? Things were actually going well by the numbers. The polls looked good. The money looked good. They were looking right at him. He looked pretty good for 81, no? Really, folks! And what choice did they have? As he liked to say, “As my father liked to say: Joey, don’t compare me to the almighty; compare me to the alternative. In total, his remarks would last for exactly ten minutes — long enough to inspire confidence in his abilities, advisers hoped, but not so long that he was at increased risk of calling those abilities further into question.

As always with this president, the production surrounding any public appearance — even if it was semi-private — came down to timing and control. He could not spend too much time out in the wild, and the circumstances in which he could exist in such an environment with so many wobbly variables would need to be managed aggressively. According to rules set by the White House, the traveling protective pool — the rotating group of reporters, run by the White House Correspondents’ Association, that trails a sitting president to provide constant coverage of his movements for the press corps — would be permitted limited access to observe his remarks before being whisked away from the reception, or “wrangled,” in communications parlance, and held elsewhere on the property (in a guest house, where somebody tuned an old television set to Real Time With Bill Maher).

Obsessive efforts to control Biden were not a new phenomenon. But whereas in the last campaign, the incredible stagecraft surrounding even the smallest Biden event — speaking to a few people at a union hall in rural Iowa, say, or in a barn in New Hampshire — seemed to be about avoiding the so-called gaffes that had become for him inevitable, the stagecraft of the 2024 campaign seems now to be about something else. The worry is not that Biden will say something overly candid, or say something he didn’t mean to say, but that he will communicate through his appearance that he is not really there.

The display early Saturday evening was the last of seven campaign events held across fou…r states in the 48 hours that followed the first presidential debate. The events were designed to serve as both proof of life for concerned wealthy patrons of the Biden reelection effort and proof of the wisdom of their choices: Other concerned wealthy people were still buying. They didn’t need to panic.

The sprawling Red Bank estate on a hill overlooking the Navesink River belonged to Goldman Sachs executive turned governor Phil Murphy. The local press had reported that hundreds were expected to attend the event. Though the $10 million property could have easily accommodated such a crowd, it was more like 50. Fewer if you subtract official staff or members of the Biden family, including the First Lady and several grandchildren. But big money comes in small packs, and Tammy Murphy, the governor’s wife, began her remarks with an unusual announcement: The couple had raised $3.7 million with their fundraiser, a number that had exceeded their goal. “This is personal for us,” the governor said. “We’re all with you 1,000 percent.” He called Biden “America’s comeback kid.” The callback to Bill Clinton articulated the nervous, defensive energy that animated the evening. But Biden had not face planted in a pit of bad press because of a mistake in his personal life. His problems would be much trickier to solve. A sex scandal might help him right now, in fact.

The president had approached the lectern with his stiff gait, which his official medical report, written by Dr. Kevin O’Connor, who has led his care since he was vice-president, attributes to a foot injury and an arthritic spine.

“I’d like to make three quick points,” Biden said. “Today we announced, since the debate, which wasn’t my best debate ever, as Barack points out, we raised $27 million.” It has long been a feature of Biden speeches to refer to the former president in this familiar way. “Barack and me” is a frequent refrain, a reminder of his service to the nation’s first Black president and a promise, too, of a return to normalcy after the aberrant rise of Donald Trump.

Although large speakers lined the patio, and although Governor and Mrs. Murphy were perfectly audible in their remarks, understanding Biden’s speech required intense focus. “POTUS was difficult to hear at times,” Tyler Pager of the Washington Post, assigned to circulate his statements in real time as the print pooler, wrote. “So please check the transcript.” The pool reporters often struggle with the challenge of how hard it is to hear or make sense of the president. Radio reporters do not always obtain usable audio of his remarks. Print reporters squint and strain and crane their necks, trying to find the best position by which their ears may absorb the vibration of his voice in the air. Reporters scrutinize their audio recordings and read quotes to one another after the fact. Is that what he said? You heard it? In that order? You sure?

Biden continued on: “Secondly, I understand the concern after the debate. I get it. We didn’t have a great night, but we’re working hard and we’re going to be working to get it done … Since the debate, the polls show a little movement and have me up a couple points.”

The donors broke into thunderous applause when the president said this about the polls. But what he said was false. Early public surveys immediately following the debate indicated that Biden was down overall a point or two, and surveys that asked respondents to rate the debate itself had him losing by mid–double digits. As a means of damage control, the campaign leaked some of its own internal polling — which had been until recently regarded as a state secret — to argue that the debate had not moved the needle: The president was losing by a slim margin before Thursday night, and he was still losing by that slim margin after Thursday night. In the days that followed, the polls would only grow grimmer.

“In fact,” Biden went on, “the big takeaway are Trump’s lies … The point is, I didn’t have a great night and neither did he.”

He returned to the central message of his campaign: “The fact is that Donald Trump is a genuine threat to democracy, and that’s not hyperbole. He’s a genuine threat. He’s a threat to our freedom, he’s a threat to our democracy, he’s literally a threat to America and what we stand for … Ask yourself the question: If not for America, who would lead the world?”

The question was posed as a reminder of the stakes of the November election. During his term in office, Trump had sought to retreat from America’s global commitments, abiding by a madman semi-isolationist theory of foreign policy that in Biden’s view and the view of many Establishment actors across the ideological divide had caused damage to the country’s reputation that will take a generation of stable leadership to undo.

Yet Biden’s comment also served as an unintentional reminder of the concerns about his own leadership. Just the day before, the Wall Street Journal had published a report that described how the president’s “frail” appearance and inconsistent “focus and performance” presented challenges on the world stage. At the G7 summit in Italy in June, Biden had the distinction of being the only world leader who did not attend a private dinner party where candid diplomatic talks would happen off-camera. At a European Union summit in Washington in October, Biden “struggled to follow the discussions” and “stumbled over his talking points” to such a degree that he required the intervention of Secretary of State Antony Blinken. (The White House denied the Journal’s reporting.)

Under vines of white moonflowers on the governor’s patio, I watched as the president neared the end of his ten-minute speech. If a gaffe is when a politician accidentally tells the truth, he was still making them. The truth he told now was this: “I’ve got a helluva lot of plans for the next four years — God willing, as my father used to say.”

In January, I began hearing similar stories from Democratic officials, activists, and donors. All people who supported the president and were working to help reelect him to a second term in office. Following encounters with the president, they had arrived at the same concern: Could he really do this for another four years? Could he even make it to Election Day?

Uniformly, these people were of a similar social strata. They lived and socialized in Washington, New York, and Los Angeles. They did not wish to come forward with their stories. They did not want to blow a whistle. They wished that they could whistle past what they knew and emerge in November victorious and relieved, having helped avoid another four years of Trump. What would happen after that? They couldn’t think that far ahead. Their worries were more immediate.

When they discussed what they knew, what they had seen, what they had …heard, they literally whispered. They were scared and horrified. But they were also burdened. They needed to talk about it (though not on the record). They needed to know that they were not alone and not crazy. Things were bad, and they knew things were bad, and they knew others must also know things were bad, and yet they would need to pretend, outwardly, that things were fine. The president was fine. The election would be fine. They would be fine. To admit otherwise would mean jeopardizing the future of the country and, well, nobody wanted to be responsible personally or socially for that. Their disclosures often followed innocent questions: Have you seen the president lately? How does he seem? Often, they would answer with only silence, their eyes widening cartoonishly, their heads shaking back and forth. Or with disapproving sounds. “Phhhhwwwaahhh.” “Uggghhhhhhhhh.” “Bbbwwhhheeuuw.” Or with a simple, “Not good! Not good!” Or with an accusatory question of their own: “Have you seen him?!”

Those who encountered the president in social settings sometimes left their interactions disturbed. Longtime friends of the Biden family, who spoke to me on the condition of anonymity, were shocked to find that the president did not remember their names. At a White House event last year, a guest recalled, with horror, realizing that the president would not be able to stay for the reception because, it was clear, he would not be able to make it through the reception. The guest wasn’t sure they could vote for Biden, since the guest was now open to an idea that they had previously dismissed as right-wing propaganda: The president may not really be the acting president after all.

Others told me the president was becoming increasingly hard to get ahold of, even as it related to official government business, the type of things any U.S. president would communicate about on a regular basis with high-level officials across the world. Biden instead was cocooned within mounting layers of bureaucracy, spoken for more than he was speaking or spoken to.

Saying hello to one Democratic megadonor and family friend at the White House recently, the president stared blankly and nodded his head. The First Lady intervened to whisper in her husband’s ear, telling him to say “hello” to the donor by name and to thank them for their recent generosity. The president repeated the words his wife had fed him. “It hasn’t been good for a long time but it’s gotten so, so much worse,” a witness to the exchange told me. “So much worse!”

Who was actually in charge? Nobody knew. But surely someone was in charge? And surely there must be a plan, since surely this situation could not endure? I heard these questions posed at cocktail parties on the coasts but also at MAGA rallies in Middle America. There emerged a comical overlap between the beliefs of the nation’s most elite liberal Biden supporters and the beliefs of the most rabid and conspiratorial supporters of former President Trump. Resistance or QAnon, they shared a grand theory of America in 2024: There has to be a secret group of high-level government leaders who control Biden and who will soon set into motion their plan to replace Biden as the Democratic presidential nominee. Nothing else made sense. They were in full agreement.

What I saw for myself confirmed something was amiss. I spent much of the spring, summer, and fall of 2020 on the primary campaign trail with Biden. In the period before he was granted Secret Service protection, his events, which were usually of modest size, were more freewheeling affairs, and reporters inched up to the candidate as he interacted with voters at the rope line. He rarely took questions. A teetotaler, he was not the kind of candidate who hung out at the hotel bar after the campaigning day was through (on occasion, Jill Biden would enjoy a glass of Pinot Noir in a Marriott lobby with her aides), but he was visible and closely observable.

A campaign trail is a grueling exercise for anybody of any age, from the youngest network embeds to the oldest would-be presidents, and back then, there were days when Biden appeared sharper than on others. I knew it was a good day when he saw me and winked. On such occasions, he joked and prayed and cried with voters. He stayed to take a photo with every supporter. He might even entertain a question or two from the press. He had color in his face. There was no question he was alive and present. On bad days, which were unpredictable but reliably occurred during a challenging news cycle, he was less animated. He stared off. He did not make eye contact. He would trip over his words, even if they were programmed in a teleprompter. On such occasions, he was hurried out of the venue quickly and ushered into a waiting SUV.

This April, at a reception before the White House Correspondents’ Dinner, I joined a sea of people waiting for a photo with the president and First Lady in the basement of the Washington Hilton. A photo line is a trauma. The main attraction must stand there, reduced to a human prop, with person after person, group after group, nodding and saying “hello” and flashing the same smile a zillion times so that guests leave the event with their little token commemorating their split second in proximity to history. People of all ages suffer in a photo line. It is tiring and unnatural, an icky transaction that requires robotic discipline on the part of its star and reveals primal horrors on the part of its participants. In Washington, even the most allegedly serious people can behave like pushy fangirls. So I grade photo-line behavior and performance on a curve. Who can be their best selves wedged into such a nightmarish dynamic? And in the basement of a Hilton, no less.

The first person I saw upon entering the subterranean space was the First Lady. I maintain personal fondness for Dr. Biden, whose controversial preferred honorific I am using out of respect. The day that my mother died, I happened to be traveling with her in Virginia, and when she learned about it, she was incredibly decent. She called to talk with me about grief, and she sent me a lovely note. The Bidens are famous for their willingness and ability to mourn with others, so I was not surprised exactly, but I was impressed, since among White House officials, members of the Biden family, and supporters of the president, I had always been treated with suspicion or outright contempt after my critical coverage of him during the 2020 campaign. I had written that there were “[c]oncerns, implicit or explicit, about his ability to stay agile and alive for the next four years,” and that “[f]or political reporters, marveling every day at just how well this isn’t going, watching Biden can feel like being at the rodeo. You’re there because on some level you know you might see someone get killed.” Biden-world insiders did not appreciate that very much, and they never forgot or fully forgave it. I was particularly touched then by the First Lady’s kindness, and I always think of that when I see her.

In the basement, I smiled and said hello. She looked back at me with a confused, panicked expression. It was as if she had just received horrible news and was about to run out of the room and into some kind of a family emergency. “Uh, hi,” she said. Then she glanced over to her right. Oh … 

I had not seen the president up close in some time. I had skipped this season’s holiday parties, and, preoccupied with covering Trump’s legal and political dramas, I hadn’t been showing up at his White House. Unlike Trump, he wasn’t very accessible to the press, anyway. Why bother? Biden had done few interviews. He wasn’t prone to interrupting his schedule with a surprise media circus in the Oval Office. He kept a tight circle of the same close advisers who had been advising him for more than 30 years, so unlike with his predecessor, you didn’t need to hang around in West Wing hallways to figure out who was speaking to him. It was all pretty locked down and predictable in terms of the reality you could access as a member of the press with a White House hard pass.

I followed the First Lady’s gaze and found the president. Now I understood her panicked expression.

Up close, the president does not look quite plausible. It’s not that he’s old. We all know what old looks like. Bernie Sanders is old. Mitch McConnell is old. Most of the ruling class is old. The president was something stranger, something not of this earth.

This was true even in 2020. His face had then an uncanny valley quality that injectable aficionados call “low trust” — if only by millimeters, his cosmetically altered proportions knocked his overall facial harmony into the realm of the improbable. His thin skin, long a figurative problem and now a literal one, was pulled tightly over cheeks that seemed to vary month to month in volume. Under artificial light and in the sunshine, he took on an unnatural gleam. He looked, well, inflated. His eyes were half-shut or open very wide. They appeared darker than they once had, his pupils dilated. He did not blink at regular intervals. The White House often did not engage when questioned about the president’s stare, which sometimes raised alarm on social media when documented in official videos produced by the White House. The administration was above conspiratorial chitchat that entertained seriously scenarios in which the president was suffering from a shocking decline most Americans were not seeing. If the president was being portrayed that way, it was by his political enemies on the right, who promoted through what the press office termed “cheap fakes” a caricature of an addled creature unfit to serve. They would not dignify those people, or people doing the bidding of those people, with a response.

For many inclined to support the president, this was good enough. They did not need to monitor the president’s public appearances, because under his leadership the country had returned to the kind of normal state in which members of a First World democratic society had the privilege to forget about the president for hours or days or even weeks at a time. Trump required constant observation. What did he just do? What would he do next? Oh God, what was he doing right at that moment? Biden could be trusted to perform the duties of his office out of sight. Many people were content to look away.

My heart stopped as I extended my hand to greet the president. I tried to make eye contact, but it was like his eyes, though open, were not on. His face had a waxy quality. He smiled. It was a sweet smile. It made me sad in a way I can’t fully convey. I always thought — and I wrote — that he was a decent man. If ambition was his only sin, and it seemed to be, he had committed no sin at all by the standards of most politicians I had covered. He took my hand in his, and I was startled by how it felt. Not cold but cool. The basement was so warm that people were sweating and complaining that they were sweating. This was a silly black-tie affair. I said “hello.” His sweet smile stayed frozen. He spoke very slowly and in a very soft voice. “And what’s your name?” he asked.

Exiting the room after the photo, the group of reporters — not instigated by me, I should note — made guesses about how dead he appeared to be, percentage wise. “Forty percent?” one of them asked.

“It was a bad night.” That’s the spin from the White House and its allies about Thursday’s debate. But when I watched the president amble stiffly across the stage, my first thought was: He doesn’t look so bad. For months, everything I had heard, plus some of what I had seen, led me to brace for something much more dire.

State Secrecy Explains the Origins of the ‘Deep State’ Conspiracy …
Many of the January 6 Capitol rioters were inspired by QAnon conspiracy theories that claimed a deep state was working to undermine President Trump and betray the electorate. If he wins this …
Did the so-called Deep State protect the country from Trump?
The book is “American Resistance: The Inside Story Of How The Deep State Saved The Nation.” You know, a lot of people in this book resisted various actions of the government for one reason or another.
The “deep state” is real. But it’s not what Trump thinks it is. – Vox
David Rohde is an editor at the New Yorker and the author of In Deep: The FBI, the CIA, and the Truth About America’s “Deep State.”. It’s a fair-minded look at the deep state and the
What is the “deep state”? – The Economist
Deep state” is the latest to gain attention, as leaks from inside the administration frustrate Donald Trump’s supporters. Right-wing websites such as Breitbart News warn of a “deep state
Trump vs. the “Deep State” – The New Yorker
In the 2013 novel “ A Delicate Truth ,” John le Carré presents thedeep state” as a moneyed, cultured élite—the “non-governmental insiders from banking, industry, and commerce …
Deep state – Wikipedia
A deep state is a type of government made up of potentially secret and unauthorized networks of power operating independently of a state‘s political leadership in pursuit of their own agenda and goals. In popular usage, the term carries overwhelmingly negative connotations. During the presidency of Donald Trump, the term “deep state” has been primarily used in the United States to describe the
Does the deep state exist? Journalist Bruce Livesey investigates
Kevin Taft is a former MLA of Alberta’s legislature and leader of Alberta’s Liberal Party from 2004 -’08. He’s also the author of 2017 bestseller Oil’s Deep State: How the petroleum industry …
Inside the Mueller inquiry and the ‘deep state’ – Harvard Law School
Inside the Mueller inquiry and thedeep state’ … In a new book, “Deep State: Trump, the FBI, and the Rule of Law,” Pulitzer Prize-winning reporter James B. Stewart ’76 , a New York Times columnist and New Yorker staff writer, offers a vivid, fly-on-the-wall account of the events that led to Mueller’s appointment by Rod Rosenstein …