Most people think that rigging an election means that ‘voting machines were manipulated‘. In fact, that is the LEAST USED way of rigging modern elections.
Here are the main ways elections are stolen and manipulated these days:
A). The Silicon Valley Big Tech oligarchs use their windfall profits to covertly send money to region political operatives, disguised as ‘benign’ groups, whose job is to run psychological manipulation schemes.
B.) Cults are easy to organize. Humans are easily able to be indoctrinated into any cult like: Scientology, Unions, Motorcycle gangs, NXIUM, Jewish Extremists, Muslim Extremists, Christian Extremists, Yuppies, Hippies, Moonies, Children of God, Heavens Gate, Aum Shinrikyo, Nazi’s, Branch Davidian, Illuminati, Acorn, DNC, GOP, Manson Family, Hindu Extremists, People’s Temple, The movement for the restoration of the ten commandments of God, The Crusaders, The Santeria religion, The assassins- a group of Nizari Ismail Muslims, a splinter group from the Shi’a sect, that formed in response to the First Crusade, Freemasons, The Elon Musk Fanboys Cult, The Bohemian Club, The Order of the Solar Temple, The Warren Jeffs Cult, Cult of Kali, and thousands more which have resulted in millions of deaths of innocent but deluded people. Any cult leaders can easily order their cults to vote one way, or another, or to undertake election manipulation ‘dirty tricks’ on behalf of some perceived ‘higher goal’ that ‘normal people ‘can’t ‘possibly understand’.
C.) Google, Paypal, Facebook-Meta, Linkedin, Netflix, YouTube and their Silicon Valley Media Cartel control 90% of the news and information in the world since they put print media out of business. Those companies are funded by, and beholden to, the DNC. They agree, covertly, to steer all news and information to only promote candidates who have agreed to help those companies. They agree, covertly, to steer all news and information to harm candidates who have not agreed to help those companies. They put Obama in office by colluding on news and information. Here is more on how they do it:
#3366ff;">Google, Facebook & Twitter’s Coordinated Mass Public Media Manipulation Violates Anti-Trust And Constitutional Rights Laws
- Victor Davis Hanson: The Pathetic Democratic Pantheon
- Margot Cleveland: Democracy Isn’t At Risk, Democrats Are
D.) Federal investigators and the nation’s top investigative journalists revealed that your politicians, and government officials at various agencies, particularly the Department of Energy, Congress and the White House, were either: financed by; friends with; sleeping with; dating the staff of; holding stock market assets in; promised a revolving door job or government service contracts from; partying with; personal friends with, photographed at private events with; exchanging emails with; business associates of, or directed by; applicant’s business adversaries; or the Senators and agency politicians that those business adversaries pay campaign finances to, or supply political digital search manipulation (ie: Google & Facebook supply web manipulation rigging) services to. For example, in one of our biggest cases, every person involved in reviewing, or managing the Department of Energy program worked for, or owned, the competitor, in total violation of RICO and anti-trust laws. 90% of the current workers in the current Administration own the stocks of the very companies they are supposed to regulate. Those workers make government decisions that only help the companies that they profit from.
Google Rigged The 2020 Election Senior Google engineer, Zach Vorhies, leaked 950 pages of internal documents that prove Google used censorship, blacklist, and machine learning algorithms to rig the 2020 election. KanekoaTheGreat Sep 21 240 7 For many of us, using the internet means using Google.
“Google’s search algorithm can easily shift the voting preferences of undecided voters by 20 percent or more — up to 80 percent in some demographic groups — with virtually no one knowing they are being manipulated,” Epstein wrote in Politico at the time. That kind of a margin could tilt an election, he noted.
I’m sure Google could, in some small way, influence elections (rig is certainly not the right word). I’m also sure that this article is just a confused mess. Normally, we might blame a lazy journalist, but since this is written by one of the researchers, the article surely doesn’t give one much confidence in the “gold-standard” research.
(San Francisco) A Google insider who anonymously leaked internal documents to Project Veritas made the decision to go public in an on-the-record video interview. The insider, Zachary Vorhies, decided to go public after receiving a letter from Google, and after he says Google allegedly called the police to perform a “wellness check” on him.
Google whistleblower Ritesh Lakhkar (left) says the company is trying to rig the election for Joe Biden. A Google whistleblower has stepped forward to expose a plot by his employers to rig the U.S. presidential election by promoting negative information about President Donald Trump while suppressing bad press on Joe Biden.
Epstein testified before Congress that Google is capable of swinging millions of votes for the Democrats, and suggested they may have already employed some of their tactics in 2018 and 2016. Specifically, Epstein claimed that, according to his research, Google attempted to give Clinton an advantage in the 2016 presidential election.
July 7, 2021 ( WND News Center) – After finding that Google’s search-engine manipulation in the 2020 election could have shifted a minimum of 6 million votes to Democrat Joe Biden, Harvard-trained…
That team of election security experts say that last summer, they discovered some systems are, in fact, online. “We found over 35 [voting systems] had been left online and we’re still …
Google manipulated from the 2.6 million to 16 million votes for Hillary Clinton in 2016 election! This was put out by a Clinton supporter, not a Trump Supporter! Google should be sued. My victory…
1. The autocomplete blacklist. This is a list of words and phrases that are excluded from the autocomplete feature in Google‘s search bar. The search bar instantly suggests multiple search options …
Inside Democrats’ Plan to Rig Elections—Permanently
Mar 3, 2021 … In 2017, Nancy Pelosi tweeted “Our election was hijacked.” What she meant by that is that the results of the election didn’t go her way.
Rigged: How the Media, Big Tech, and the Democrats Seized Our …
Rigged: How the Media, Big Tech, and the Democrats Seized Our Elections [Hemingway, Mollie] on Amazon.com. *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers.
‘Rigged elections,’ ‘voter fraud’ — words for Democrats, not just for …
Sep 15, 2022 … I suspect we’ll hear a lot about “MAGA Republicans” between now and Nov. 8, about how they’re “a threat to our democracy,” or as President …
How U.S. Politicians Rig Elections – YouTube
Oct 21, 2020 … In a democracy, voters are meant to choose the politicians. But sometimes, in the United States, politicians get to pick voters.
How to Rig an Election — National Election Defense Coalition
Old-school ballot-box fraud at its most egregious was localized and limited in scope. But new electronic voting systems allow insiders to rig elections on a …
The Secret Bipartisan Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election – TIME
Feb 4, 2021 … As President Trump refused to concede, the response was not mass action but crickets. When media organizations called the race for Joe Biden on …
After decrying Republican election rigging, Democrats embrace it in …
Feb 3, 2022 … Democrats propose new redistricting maps that would give the party three additional seats in Congress.
How to rig an election in three not-so-easy steps – Brookings Institution
Nov 30, 2017 … The list of other ways you can commit electoral fraud is lengthy. Voter intimidation, vote buying, disinformation, confusing or misleading …
After decrying Republican election rigging, Democrats embrace it in New York
Democrats propose new redistricting maps that would give the party three additional seats in Congress
New York Democrats are plowing ahead with an aggressive effort to rig the state’s electoral maps to give the party as many as three additional seats in Congress, a move that comes as the party has denounced similar Republican-led efforts in other states as anti-democratic.
Democrats currently have a 19-8 advantage in New York’s delegation to the US House of Representatives. Their proposed districts, unveiled on Sunday, would give them up to three additional seats, increasing their advantage to 22-4. (There is one fewer seat overall in New York because of population shifts.)
The plan puts Democrats in an awkward political position. “Democrats have given up any high ground they had over Republicans on gerrymandering,” Pat Kiernan, the popular local news anchor, tweeted on Sunday.
“These maps are the most brazen and outrageous attempt at rigging the election to keep Nancy Pelosi as speaker,” Nick Langworthy, the chairman of the state Republican party, said in a statement. “What they’re doing is textbook, filthy, partisan gerrymandering.”
Over the last few months, Democrats in Congress have led efforts calling for an end to excessive partisan gerrymandering – an effort that failed last month when Republicans filibustered a sweeping voting rights bill. They’ve watched as Republican legislatures across the US have carved up district lines to their advantage to help the GOP as they try to take control of the US House later this year.
But New York is one of the few places where Democrats have complete control of the process and a chance to gain Democratic seats. Nationally, Republicans have complete control over the drawing of 187 districts and Democrats have control over just 75. More than a third of the districts Democrats will draw are in New York.
Here’s how they’re doing it in one of them.
“We’re not ignorant of the national implications of our work. But we have a long list of standards under New York law that we are required to comply with and that’s what drove our decision-making,” Michael Gianaris, a top Democrat in the New York state senate, told the Guardian. “It shouldn’t be surprising that a fairly drawn map in a deep blue state winds up electing more people of that persuasion. But that doesn’t mean that’s why the maps were drawn the way they were.”
Michael Li, a redistricting expert at the Brennan Center for Justice, said it was hard to buy that the map merely reflected the political preferences of New Yorkers. Joe Biden won about 60% of the statewide vote in 2020, he noted, but the proposal would give Democrats control over as many as 85% of the districts. “It’s a very solidly blue state. But it’s not as blue as these maps have it,” he said.
The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, charged with protecting Democrats’ advantage in the House, did not return a request for comment.
Democrats, who hold a narrow super majority in the state legislature, approved the plan on Wednesday without holding a public hearing on the maps – a decision that has infuriated voting advocates. “They’re just muscling it through,” said Blair Horner, the executive director of the New York Public Interest Research Group.
Advocates representing minority voters said the new district unfairly splits their communities, making it more difficult for voters there to have influence. Sunset Park, a Brooklyn neighborhood with a high Asian and Latino population, is now split, Mon Yuck Yu, executive vice-president and chief of staff at the Academy of Medical & Public Health Services, told reporters on Tuesday.
Yafa Dias, the lead organizer of the Arab Association of New York, said the new lines were “almost comedically gerrymandered”. She noted that her organization’s offices would now be in one congressional district, while the voters they advocated for would be in another.
There are notable differences in the gerrymandering strategy New York Democrats deployed compared with the one Republicans have used elsewhere, like in Texas, said Li, the Brennan Center redistricting expert.
In Texas, much of the GOP gerrymandering focused on padding Republican advantages in districts that seemed increasingly competitive. Republicans have been so successful at pursuing this aim that just one of the state’s 38 congressional districts was decided within a margin of 5 points in the last election. In New York, by contrast, Democrats have spread out their voters to give them a greater number of districts, Li noted, but didn’t create any new districts that are overwhelmingly safe. It’s a strategy that leaves room for Republicans to win back some of the Democratic districts under the right conditions in the future.
“Democrats are betting that their coalition in recent years mostly holds – that they don’t need to draw super Biden districts because their coalition is mostly going to stay intact,” Li said. “Republicans are looking at demographic change and political shifts in the suburbs and they’re scared of the future.”
In 2014, New York voters approved a ballot measure to create a 10-member bipartisan advisory commission to draw maps as part of an effort to bring more fairness to the process. But the panel never reached a consensus on a plan and the legislature rejected its proposals, taking redistricting power back for itself.
Li observed that the sweeping voting rights legislation Republicans blocked in Congress contained a provision that would have allowed a federal court to step in and quickly stop rigged maps like those in New York from going into effect.
“I do think Republicans are right to cry foul. On the other hand, they could have created a stronger process for redistricting, they could have supported the Freedom to Vote Act,” he said. “Republicans are a little bit like the people who said I don’t need to have car insurance because ‘I’ll never have an accident.’”